Structured Adversarial Debate

Truth Through
AI Debate

Enter any claim and watch AI perspectives argue across multiple rounds. See sources gathered, rebuttals formed, and judges deliberate in real-time.

Coffee is bad for your healthBitcoin uses more energy than ArgentinaCold showers boost immunity
Browse AI-Debated Claims
Extracted from the Internet
→
Joe Rogan Fact-Checker
Live fact-checking of JRE episodes
→
All In Podcast Fact-Checker
Verify claims from the besties
→
Huberman Lab Fact-Checker
Science-backed health claims verified
→
Diary of a CEO Fact-Checker
Verify claims from Steven Bartlett
→
More Than Milestones Fact-Checker
Verify claims from the podcast
→
Making Sense Fact-Checker
Verify claims from Sam Harris
→
CDC Fact-Checker
Verify claims from CDC videos
→
User Submitted Queries→
LIVE DEMONSTRATION

Watch a Multi-Round Debate Unfold

Real adversarial fact-checking with opening arguments, rebuttals, key exchanges, and judge assessment

verque.app/claim/dzdblMCp5a4/7
Structured Debate AnalysisClaim #7
“Coffee consumption is harmful to cardiovascular health”
SpeakerGuest
Timestamp1:23:45
Rounds3
Sources12
Final Verdict
Judge Assessment with 87% Confidence
87%
Confidence
Oppose Wins Decisively
Analyzing claim and gathering sources...
PHASE 1/4
Debate Rounds
Streaming...
Round 1: Opening Arguments
--
--
Support Arguments
Caffeine can temporarily increase blood pressure in some individuals
Excessive consumption linked to anxiety and sleep disruption
Some studies show association with arrhythmias in sensitive groups
Oppose Arguments
Meta-analyses of 40+ studies show moderate coffee reduces heart disease risk by 15%
Large cohort studies (400K+ participants) link 3-4 cups daily to lower mortality
WHO removed coffee from carcinogen list; antioxidant benefits documented
Round Synthesis
The opposing side presents significantly stronger evidence with peer-reviewed meta-analyses and large population studies. Support relies primarily on edge cases and temporary physiological effects rather than long-term health outcomes.
Round 2: Rebuttal Phase
--
--
Key ExchangeOppose Wins
Support
“Blood pressure spikes after coffee consumption prove cardiovascular stress”
Oppose Counter
“Acute BP changes are transient (15-30 min) and tolerance develops. Longitudinal data shows no sustained hypertension risk in habitual consumers.”
Key ExchangeOppose Wins
Support
“Arrhythmia risk in certain populations cannot be ignored”
Oppose Counter
“2022 NEJM study (n=100K) found no increased AF risk with moderate consumption. Sensitive individuals are edge cases, not representative of general population effects.”
Judge Assessment
Support side fails to address the methodological superiority of oppose's evidence. Rebuttals rely on special cases while ignoring the robust consensus from meta-analyses. Momentum strongly favors oppose.
Round 3: Final Arguments
--
--
Support Concessions
Acknowledges that moderate consumption in healthy adults appears safe
Concedes meta-analysis evidence is stronger than individual studies cited
Formulating final position...
Strongest Remaining Points
J-shaped dose-response: 3-4 cups optimal, supported by multiple independent studies
Coffee's polyphenols provide documented anti-inflammatory effects
Support side's evidence quality gap: no Tier-1 sources vs. 8 meta-analyses
Final Judge Assessment
Evidence Sources
Searching...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govTier 1
Meta-analysis of 40 prospective studies: moderate coffee consumption associated with 15% reduced CVD risk (RR: 0.85, 95% CI)...
Opposes Claim
nejm.orgTier 1
Large cohort (n=100,247): No association between habitual coffee consumption and increased atrial fibrillation risk...
Opposes Claim
ahajournals.orgTier 1
American Heart Association: Coffee consumption up to 4 cups/day is not associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes...
Opposes Claim
nature.comTier 2
Acute caffeine intake produces transient increases in blood pressure (5-10 mmHg) lasting 15-30 minutes...
Supports Claim
METHODOLOGY

How Adversarial Debate Works

Multi-round structured argumentation produces more reliable verdicts than single-model approaches

1

Claim Extraction

AI identifies verifiable claims from text, podcasts, or videos with context and speaker attribution.

2

Opening Arguments

Support and oppose sides research independently, gathering tiered sources and forming initial arguments.

3

Rebuttal Rounds

Each side attacks opponent arguments with specific rebuttals. Key exchanges are scored with winners declared.

4

Judge Verdict

Neutral judge evaluates evidence quality, procedural penalties, and argument strength for final confidence-scored verdict.

Ready to See the Truth?

Try our multi-round AI debate fact-checking or explore verified podcast claims.

Request Early AccessTry Podcast Fact-Checker →